Judge Dalton Strikes Healthe’s Confounding Counter-Counterclaims in Sterilray Litigation
The Honorable Roy B. Dalton, Jr., overseeing litigation Healthe, Inc. v. High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a/ Far-UV Sterilray, S. Edward Neister, and Pathogen Path Consulting LLC, Case No. 6:20-cv-02233-RBD-EJK (M.D. Fla.), reviewed and considered: Healthe’s Complaint alleging unfair trade practices and seeking a declaration it isn’t infringing on HEO3’s patents; HEO3’s Motion to Dismiss asserting Healthe has infringed on HEO3’s 222nm wavelength ultraviolet light technology patent claims and continues to do so; and Healthe’s Reply raising five affirmative defenses saying it didn’t infringe on HEO3’s patents and asserting some counter-counterclaims or claims in reply. In an Order released last…
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- John K. Roberts at L3Harris Explains to Judge Albright Why Walmart Infringes on Solid-State Light Source Technology Designed by Bridgelux
- Drs. Michael Lebby & Brian D’Andrade Explain to Judge Gilliland Current Lighting Isn’t Infringing on Jiaxing & Obert’s Lighting Technology Patents
- Duplo Turns to Drs. Charles F. Reinholtz & Chris E. Scott to Explain How It Doesn’t Infringe on MGI Digital’s Ultraviolet Printing Technology Patents
- Samsung & Seoul Semi Call Validity of LED Wafer’s Lighting Technology Patents into Question
- Hilco Says Recently Unsealed <i>Qui Tam</i> Claims Included in LiteSheet Asset Sale