State of New Jersey vs. Yvonne Jeannotte-Rodriguez and Company for Practicing Medicine without License
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. YVONNE JEANNOTTE-RODRIGUEZ, MARTA I. GALVAN, and LISA FERRARO Attorney(s) appearing for the Case Jay McCann , Chief Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent State of New Jersey (Camelia M. Valdes, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney; Jay McCann, of counsel and on the briefs). Nathan Kittner argued the cause for respondent Yvonne Jeannotte-Rodriguez (Nathan Kittner , attorney; Nathan Kittner and Jonathan Mincis, on the brief). Amie E. DiCola argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant Marta I. Galvan (The Law Offices of Fusco & Macaluso, PC, attorneys; Amie E. DiCola, on the brief). Joseph…
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- Samsung & Seoul Semi Call Validity of LED Wafer’s Lighting Technology Patents into Question
- John K. Roberts at L3Harris Explains to Judge Albright Why Walmart Infringes on Solid-State Light Source Technology Designed by Bridgelux
- Drs. Michael Lebby & Brian D’Andrade Explain to Judge Gilliland Current Lighting Isn’t Infringing on Jiaxing & Obert’s Lighting Technology Patents
- Duplo Turns to Drs. Charles F. Reinholtz & Chris E. Scott to Explain How It Doesn’t Infringe on MGI Digital’s Ultraviolet Printing Technology Patents
- Hilco Says Recently Unsealed <i>Qui Tam</i> Claims Included in LiteSheet Asset Sale