The Patent Trial and Appeal Board entered two final written decisions finding a variety of claims contained in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,465,961 and 6,634,770 aren’t patentable by CAO Lighting and, as a result, Cree, Inc., and IDEAL Industries Lighting LLC, d/b/a Cree Lighting can’t be infringing on those technology claims. The PTAB’s rulings following inter…
Siding with Cree & IDEAL, P.T.A.B. Rules Many of CAO Lighting’s Technology Claims Aren’t Patentable
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- Ilumi (of Shark Tank Fame) & Gemstone Lights Filed Second Wave of Summary Judgment Briefs in Ultraviolet Lighting Patent Dispute
- SemiLED Sues Green Creative & Industrial Lighting for Infringing on Patented UV Lighting Technology
- Bellyard Wants Class Action Lawsuit Against Falfurrias & Sluss + Padgett Complaining About Global Plasma Devices Sent Back to Georgia State Court
- Judge Cecchi Directs Able C&C and Class Action Plaintiffs to Mediation in Waterproof Sunscreen Dispute
- Ilumi (of Shark Tank Fame) Moves to Exclude Testimony from Gemstone Lights’ Expert Joseph Gemini in Ultraviolet Lighting Patent Dispute