In a 26-page Opposition filed this week, Larson Electronics LLC says the facts surrounding High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray’s contact with Larson customers aren’t as minimal as HEO3 portrays in its motion to dismiss Larson’s counterclaims. Larson denies it is has infringed on any ultraviolet sterilization technology described in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and 9,700,642. Sterilray denies…
At the request of High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray this week, the 222 nm disinfection technology developer and manufacturer’s patent infringement lawsuits against Eden Park Illumination, Inc., and Far UV Technologies will be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated pre-trial proceedings with a similar lawsuit against…
In a 31-page legal filing this week, High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray lays out it’s case for why U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and 9,700,642 aren’t attempts to patent natural sunlight as asserted by Larson Electronics LLC, Eden Park Illumination, Inc., and Far UV Technologies in their defenses against patent infringement lawsuits HEO3’s filed. Additionally, Sterilray wants…
Far UV Technologies amended its counterclaims against High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray (commonly known as HEO3) in on-going patent litigation before the Honorable Gary A. Fenner in the Western District of Missouri. HEO3 says Far UV’s Krypton-Shield, Krypton-11, Krypton-36, Krypton-M, Krypton-PLUS infringe on the sterilization technology described in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and…
High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray has moved to dismiss the counterclaims Larson Electronics LLC raised after denying it is has infringed on any ultraviolet sterilization technology described in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and 9,700,642. Sterilray denies it has harmed or damaged Larson’s business by filing its patent lawsuit and contacting Larson’s customers and other business partners.“In…
Larson Electronics LLC tells the Honorable Barbara M.G. Lynn in Dallas and Eden Park Illumination, Inc., tells the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr., in Chicago they have not infringed on any sterilization technology described by High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and 9,700,642 because Sterilray’s patents are not patent-eligible under…
Far UV Technologies tells the Honorable Gary A. Fenner in the Western District of Missouri its Krypton-Shield, Krypton-11, Krypton-36, Krypton-M, Krypton-PLUS don’t infringe on the sterilization technology described in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and 9,700,642 as asserted in a lawsuit filed by High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray (commonly known as HEO3) and its…
Larson Electronics LLC continues to deny is has infringed on any High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray UV sterilization technology described in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and 9,700,642, and now charges Sterilray with harming and damaging Larson’s business by filing its patent lawsuit and contacting Larson’s customers and other business partners. Larson is represented by a group…
High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a/ Far-UV Sterilray and Inventor S. Edward Neister tell the Honorable Roy B. Dalton, Jr., all of the words used in their UV technology patents are plain on their face and require no construction at all. “The Court should not waste its time on [the] futile exercise” Healthe, Inc., encourages interpreting…
Larson Electronics LLC denies it has committed or is committing acts of infringement and denies High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray is entitled to any judicial relief concerning sterilization technology described in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,975,605 and 9,700,642. Larson says HEO3’s vague use of the phrases “the lighting business,” “lighting products containing Far-UV wavelengths including 222 nm,”…
Can't find what you're looking for? Try refining your search: