Lawyers at Fish & Richardson P.C., representing a quartet of ultraviolet lighting companies, tell the Patent Trial and Appeal Board they shouldn’t give any weight to the “inventor-generated documents” S. Edward Neister and High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray provided the tribunal last month. “[A]n undated report that Neister wrote . . . a…
Ignore Dr. Neister’s Lab Notebook & Other “Inventor Generated Documents,” Eden Park, Larson, Far UV & Ushio’s Tell P.T.A.B. in UV Patent Review Proceeding
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- Ilumi (of Shark Tank Fame) & Gemstone Lights Filed Second Wave of Summary Judgment Briefs in Ultraviolet Lighting Patent Dispute
- Bellyard Wants Class Action Lawsuit Against Falfurrias & Sluss + Padgett Complaining About Global Plasma Devices Sent Back to Georgia State Court
- SemiLED Sues Green Creative & Industrial Lighting for Infringing on Patented UV Lighting Technology
- Judge Cecchi Directs Able C&C and Class Action Plaintiffs to Mediation in Waterproof Sunscreen Dispute
- Ilumi (of Shark Tank Fame) Moves to Exclude Testimony from Gemstone Lights’ Expert Joseph Gemini in Ultraviolet Lighting Patent Dispute