Global Plasma Says Professional Class Action Plaintiff’s Lawsuit Attacking Sanitizing Products Is Devoid of Facts and Should Be Dismissed
Global Plasma Solutions Inc. wants the Honorable Colm F. Connolly to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging the company’s ultraviolet sanitizing products don’t work and hurt people. “ Global’s legal team, led by Robert A. Muckenfuss, Esq., at McGuireWoods LLP in Charlotte, N.C., tells the Court Robert S. Garner — the named plaintiff — is a professional plaintiff whose lawsuit is “heavy on breathless news articles with vague quotes from supposed experts who speak only generally aboutair ionization technology. But,” like a similar lawsuit captioned Lisowski & Garner v. Henry Thayer Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:19-cv1339-MJH (W.D. Pa.),…
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- Duplo Turns to Drs. Charles F. Reinholtz & Chris E. Scott to Explain How It Doesn’t Infringe on MGI Digital’s Ultraviolet Printing Technology Patents
- Samsung & Seoul Semi Call Validity of LED Wafer’s Lighting Technology Patents into Question
- John K. Roberts at L3Harris Explains to Judge Albright Why Walmart Infringes on Solid-State Light Source Technology Designed by Bridgelux
- Drs. Michael Lebby & Brian D’Andrade Explain to Judge Gilliland Current Lighting Isn’t Infringing on Jiaxing & Obert’s Lighting Technology Patents
- Hilco Says Recently Unsealed <i>Qui Tam</i> Claims Included in LiteSheet Asset Sale