In a reply brief filed in court this week, EssilorLuxottica says the eyewear purchasers suing it for alleged antitrust violations never explain how it supposedly “eliminated competition” or “established price floors” that harmed consumers. Being big isn’t illegal, and lawful vertical integration and good business aren’t antitrust violations. EssilorLuxottica says the plaintiffs’ complaint is long…
EssilorLuxottica Says Direct & Indirect Eyewear Purchasers Are Misguided in S.D.N.Y. Eyewear Antitrust Litigation
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- Ilumi (of Shark Tank Fame) & Gemstone Lights Filed Second Wave of Summary Judgment Briefs in Ultraviolet Lighting Patent Dispute
- Bellyard Wants Class Action Lawsuit Against Falfurrias & Sluss + Padgett Complaining About Global Plasma Devices Sent Back to Georgia State Court
- SemiLED Sues Green Creative & Industrial Lighting for Infringing on Patented UV Lighting Technology
- Judge Cecchi Directs Able C&C and Class Action Plaintiffs to Mediation in Waterproof Sunscreen Dispute
- Ilumi (of Shark Tank Fame) Moves to Exclude Testimony from Gemstone Lights’ Expert Joseph Gemini in Ultraviolet Lighting Patent Dispute