The purported class plaintiffs suing Supergoop LLC tell the Court the company’s motion to dismiss, discussing Article III standing, preemption, sufficiency of notice, and privity, misses the mark because it fails to counter the claimants’ primary contention that Supergoop sunscreen products don’t meet the SPF level advertised or recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology.…
This content is viewable by members only. Visit MY ACCOUNT on the top menu to log in or to register for a 30 day free trial or purchase a subscription for UV Reporter 1 Year Single Membership or UV Reporter 1 Year Group Membership - $189 for first member and $25 for each additional member.
