This content is viewable by members only. Visit MY ACCOUNT on the top menu to log in or to register for a 30 day free trial or purchase a subscription for UV Reporter 1 Year Single Membership or UV Reporter 1 Year Group Membership - $189 for first member and $25 for each additional member.
Class Action Lawsuit Accuses Christian Dior of Exaggerating Foundation Products’ Sunscreen Protection Benefits by More than 1,000%
Lawyers at GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP in San Francisco filed a class action lawsuit last week against Christian Dior, Inc., to seek redress for “deceptive and unlawful practices in labeling and marketing its cosmetic products that make ’24 HR’ claims in conjunction with SPF claims, such as ’24H FOUNDATION … WITH SUNSCREEN’ and ’24H WEAR … FOUNDATION WITH SUNSCREEN.’ The lawsuit says Dior’s sunscreen product provides no more than two hours of protection from harmful sunlight.
Published in Legal
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- John K. Roberts at L3Harris Explains to Judge Albright Why Walmart Infringes on Solid-State Light Source Technology Designed by Bridgelux
- Drs. Michael Lebby & Brian D’Andrade Explain to Judge Gilliland Current Lighting Isn’t Infringing on Jiaxing & Obert’s Lighting Technology Patents
- Duplo Turns to Drs. Charles F. Reinholtz & Chris E. Scott to Explain How It Doesn’t Infringe on MGI Digital’s Ultraviolet Printing Technology Patents
- Samsung & Seoul Semi Call Validity of LED Wafer’s Lighting Technology Patents into Question
- Hilco Says Recently Unsealed <i>Qui Tam</i> Claims Included in LiteSheet Asset Sale