Healthe & Sterilray Continue Bickering About Which Patent Claims Should or Shouldn’t Proceed to Trial
Healthe, Inc. tells the Honorable Roy B. Dalton, Jr., he should deny the partial motion to dismiss submitted by High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a/ Far-UV Sterilray and S. Edward Neister and allow its lawsuit to march to trial. Sterilray’s motion to dismiss “relies on inflammatory accusations, mischaracterizations of facts and law, and intentional omissions of relevant information in a meritless attempt to dismiss several of Healthe’s claims and avoid consequences for their misdeeds,” Healthe says. Barnes & Thornburg LLP represent Healthe, Inc., with the assistance of local counsel at Akerman LLP. A copy of Healthe’s filing opposing the motion…
More from LegalMore posts in Legal »
- John K. Roberts at L3Harris Explains to Judge Albright Why Walmart Infringes on Solid-State Light Source Technology Designed by Bridgelux
- Drs. Michael Lebby & Brian D’Andrade Explain to Judge Gilliland Current Lighting Isn’t Infringing on Jiaxing & Obert’s Lighting Technology Patents
- Duplo Turns to Drs. Charles F. Reinholtz & Chris E. Scott to Explain How It Doesn’t Infringe on MGI Digital’s Ultraviolet Printing Technology Patents
- Samsung & Seoul Semi Call Validity of LED Wafer’s Lighting Technology Patents into Question
- Hilco Says Recently Unsealed <i>Qui Tam</i> Claims Included in LiteSheet Asset Sale